Posted By Joshua Keating Share

Mitt Romney apparently described Russia as "without question our No. 1 geopolitical foe" on CNN today, while discussing the president's unfortunate hot mic incident. Romney was challenged on the statement by host Wolf Blitzer and a number of commentators are already discussing it as a "gaffe."

Romney stuck by the claim when Blitzer asked if he was really saying that Russia is a greater foe than Iran, China or North Korea: 

Well, I'm saying in terms of a geopolitical opponent, the nation that lines up with the world's worst actors.  Of course, the greatest threat that the world faces is a nuclear Iran.  A nuclear North Korea is already troubling enough.

But when these -- these terrible actors pursue their course in the world and we go to the United Nations looking for ways to stop them, when -- when Assad, for instance, is murdering his own people, we go -- we go to the United Nations, and who is it that always stands up for the world's worst actors?

It is always Russia, typically with China alongside.

While one can certainly argue with the statement, it's not at all inconsistent with Romney's previously stated positions on Russia. This is the same candidate who described the New START treaty as Obama's "worst foreign policy mistake":

New-START gives Russia a massive nuclear weapon advantage over the United States. The treaty ignores tactical nuclear weapons, where Russia outnumbers us by as much as 10 to 1. Obama heralds a reduction in strategic weapons from approximately 2,200 to 1,550 but fails to mention that Russia will retain more than 10,000 nuclear warheads that are categorized as tactical because they are mounted on missiles that cannot reach the United States. But surely they can reach our allies, nations that depend on us for a nuclear umbrella. And who can know how those tactical nuclear warheads might be reconfigured? Astonishingly, while excusing tactical nukes from the treaty, the Obama administration bows to Russia's insistence that conventional weapons mounted on ICBMs are counted under the treaty's warhead and launcher limits.

By all indications, the Obama administration has been badly out-negotiated. Perhaps the president's eagerness for global disarmament led his team to accede to Russia's demands, or perhaps it led to a document that was less than carefully drafted.

Here's his take on the "reset" from an interview with Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin:

He’s under no illusions about Vladi­mir Putin. He is convinced that Putin dreams of “rebuilding the Russian empire.” He says, “That includes annexing populations as they did in Georgia and using gas and oil resources” to throw their weight around in Europe. He maintains that the START treaty was tilted toward Russia. “It has to end,” he says emphatically about “reset.” “We have to show strength.” I ask him about WTO, which has been much in the news as Putin blusters and demands entry into the trade organization. Romney is again definitive. “Letting people into WTO who intend to cheat is obviously a mistake.”

Is the most recent comment an escalation of rhetoric? Absolutely. But it's not really a change in position. (Yes, Romney did once call Iran "the greatest threat the world faces," but that's not quite the same thing as a "geopolitical foe".) Expect more of this line of attack as we move into the general election.

 

BLUE13326

8:35 AM ET

March 27, 2012

Of course, he's correct;

Of course, he's correct; Iran, N. Korea and not big/rich/important enough, and China is still nominally our friend and one of our largest trading partners.

 

DOUB1ETAP

11:11 AM ET

March 27, 2012

One perspective

There is always a tendency in American politics to portray Russia as a Dr. Evil, working on a sinister plot with the great Axis of Evil.
Let's be clear: America is at a "nuclear disadvantage" to no one. It doesn't matter how many START treaties you sign.
We worry about Russia "throwing it's weight around in Europe" It is a European country, that is expected.
What would America do if Russia signed a mutual security agreement with Mexico? That is what America was about to do with Georgia.
The Georgia crisis was accelerated by America offering Georgia a place within NATO.

 

ROB634

4:36 PM ET

March 27, 2012

Deterrence

Someone needs to explain deterrence to this generation of Republicans. It doesn't matter if Russia has a marginally higher number of nukes than we do, we still have more then enough nuclear firepower to utterly annihilate Russia in the event of a first strike, and the same can be said about Russia in the even of an American first strike. But I think many of the Republicans know that and just want to use the average American's ignorance to further the Obama-is-making-us-weak narrative by pointing out that 2,200 is greater than 1,550, even if that inequality is completely and utterly irrelevant.
Russia is in such a profoundly weak position right now it is laughable to try and pretend that Putin is reconstituting the Soviet threat.

 

DEVINDENNIS

6:52 AM ET

April 13, 2012

Advertising

I am currently searching for ways in which I could enhance my knowledge in this said topic you have posted here. It does help me a lot knowing that you have shared this information here freely.
Advertising| Advertisement| Advertising company

 

This blog does not have any specific about information tied to it.

Read More